You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Nonperennial Flow Regimes in the Contiguous United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2020gl090794 |
| Authors |
John C. Hammond, Margaret Zimmer, Margaret Shanafield, Kendra Kaiser, Sarah E. Godsey, Meryl C. Mims, Samuel C. Zipper, Ryan M. Burrows, Stephanie K. Kampf, Walter Dodds, C. Nathan Jones, Corey A. Krabbenhoft, Kate S. Boersma, Thibault Datry, Julian D. Olden, George H. Allen, Adam N. Price, Katie Costigan, Rebecca Hale, Adam S. Ward, Daniel C. Allen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 41% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 37 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 42 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 40 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#833,861
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#1,717
of 21,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,974
of 530,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#40
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.