↓ Skip to main content

Central sensitization: a biopsychosocial explanation for chronic widespread pain in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 3,077)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
413 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
684 Mendeley
Title
Central sensitization: a biopsychosocial explanation for chronic widespread pain in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10067-006-0433-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mira Meeus, Jo Nijs

Abstract

In addition to the debilitating fatigue, the majority of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) experience chronic widespread pain. These pain complaints show the greatest overlap between CFS and fibromyalgia (FM). Although the literature provides evidence for central sensitization as cause for the musculoskeletal pain in FM, in CFS this evidence is currently lacking, despite the observed similarities in both diseases. The knowledge concerning the physiological mechanism of central sensitization, the pathophysiology and the pain processing in FM, and the knowledge on the pathophysiology of CFS lead to the hypothesis that central sensitization is also responsible for the sustaining pain complaints in CFS. This hypothesis is based on the hyperalgesia and allodynia reported in CFS, on the elevated concentrations of nitric oxide presented in the blood of CFS patients, on the typical personality styles seen in CFS and on the brain abnormalities shown on brain images. To examine the present hypothesis more research is required. Further investigations could use similar protocols to those already used in studies on pain in FM like, for example, studies on temporal summation, spatial summation, the role of psychosocial aspects in chronic pain, etc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 684 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 663 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 112 16%
Student > Bachelor 88 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 12%
Researcher 73 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 9%
Other 163 24%
Unknown 105 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 233 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 110 16%
Psychology 74 11%
Neuroscience 26 4%
Sports and Recreations 24 4%
Other 84 12%
Unknown 133 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#453,339
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#26
of 3,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#964
of 156,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.