↓ Skip to main content

Dosage effect on uropathogenic Escherichia coli anti-adhesion activity in urine following consumption of cranberry powder standardized for proanthocyanidin content: a multicentric randomized double…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
patent
4 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dosage effect on uropathogenic Escherichia coli anti-adhesion activity in urine following consumption of cranberry powder standardized for proanthocyanidin content: a multicentric randomized double blind study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-94
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy B Howell, Henry Botto, Christophe Combescure, Anne-Béatrice Blanc-Potard, Lluis Gausa, Tetsuro Matsumoto, Peter Tenke, Albert Sotto, Jean-Philippe Lavigne

Abstract

Ingestion of cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) has traditionally been utilized for prevention of urinary tract infections. The proanthocyanidins (PACs) in cranberry, in particular the A-type linkages have been implicated as important inhibitors of primarily P-fimbriated E. coli adhesion to uroepithelial cells. Additional experiments were required to investigate the persistence in urine samples over a broader time period, to determine the most effective dose per day and to determine if the urinary anti-adhesion effect following cranberry is detected within volunteers of different origins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 281 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Student > Master 36 12%
Other 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Chemistry 13 4%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 77 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#255,300
of 24,811,594 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#65
of 8,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#626
of 99,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.