You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Forest Restoration and Fuels Reduction: Convergent or Divergent?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biaa134 |
| Authors |
Scott L Stephens, Mike A Battaglia, Derek J Churchill, Brandon M Collins, Michelle Coppoletta, Chad M Hoffman, Jamie M Lydersen, Malcolm P North, Russell A Parsons, Scott M Ritter, Jens T Stevens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,130,458
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#811
of 2,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,207
of 509,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.