| Title |
Differential effects of two phospholipase D inhibitors, 1-butanol and N-acylethanolamine, on in vivo cytoskeletal organization and Arabidopsis seedling growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Protoplasma, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00709-005-0124-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christy M. Motes, Priit Pechter, Cheol Min Yoo, Yuh-Shuh Wang, Kent D. Chapman, Elison B. Blancaflor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#133
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,339
of 151,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.