| Title |
Food hypersensitivity by inhalation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Molecular Allergy, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-7961-7-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel A Ramirez, Sami L Bahna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 81% |
| Scientists | 7 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#286,624
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#2
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#591
of 110,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them