↓ Skip to main content

The S20G substitution in hIAPP is more amyloidogenic and cytotoxic than wild-type hIAPP in mouse islets

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The S20G substitution in hIAPP is more amyloidogenic and cytotoxic than wild-type hIAPP in mouse islets
Published in
Diabetologia, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00125-016-4045-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel T. Meier, Leon Entrup, Andrew T. Templin, Meghan F. Hogan, Mahnaz Mellati, Sakeneh Zraika, Rebecca L. Hull, Steven E. Kahn

Abstract

The S20G human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) substitution is associated with an earlier onset of type 2 diabetes in humans. Studies of synthetic S20G hIAPP in cell-free systems and immortalised beta cells have suggested that this may be due to increased hIAPP amyloidogenicity and cytotoxicity. Thus, using primary islets from mice with endogenous S20G hIAPP expression, we sought to determine whether the S20G gene mutation leads to increased amyloid-induced toxicity, beta cell loss and reduced beta cell function. Islets from mice in which mouse Iapp was replaced with human wild-type or S20G hIAPP were isolated and cultured in vitro under amyloid-forming conditions. Levels of insulin and hIAPP mRNA and protein, amyloid deposition and beta cell apoptosis and area, as well as glucose-stimulated insulin and hIAPP secretion, were quantified. Islets expressing S20G hIAPP cultured in 16.7 mmol/l glucose demonstrated increased amyloid deposition and beta cell apoptosis, reduced beta cell area, decreased insulin content and diminished glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, compared with islets expressing wild-type hIAPP. Amyloid deposition and beta cell apoptosis were also increased when S20G islets were cultured in 11.1 mmol/l glucose (the concentration that is thought to be physiological for mouse islets). S20G hIAPP reduces beta cell number and function, thereby possibly explaining the earlier onset of type 2 diabetes in individuals carrying this gene mutation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 21%
Chemistry 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,335,423
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,884
of 5,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,452
of 337,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#73
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.