↓ Skip to main content

Imaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in early preclinical alzheimer disease

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in early preclinical alzheimer disease
Published in
Annals of Neurology, July 2016
DOI 10.1002/ana.24719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrei G. Vlassenko, Lena McCue, Mateusz S. Jasielec, Yi Su, Brian A. Gordon, Chengjie Xiong, David M. Holtzman, Tammie L. S. Benzinger, John C. Morris, Anne M. Fagan

Abstract

Deposition of Aβ-containing plaques as evidenced by amyloid imaging and CSF Aβ42 is an early indicator of preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD). To better understand their relationship during the earliest preclinical stages, we investigated baseline CSF markers in cognitively normal individuals at different stages of amyloid deposition defined by longitudinal amyloid imaging with Pittsburgh Compound B (PIB): 1) PIB-negative at baseline and follow-up (PIB-, normal); 2) PIB- at baseline but PIB-positive at follow-up (PIB converters, early preclinical AD); and 3) PIB-positive at baseline and follow-up (PIB+, preclinical AD). Cognitively normal individuals (n=164) who had undergone baseline PIB scan and CSF collection within one year of each other and at least one additional PIB follow-up were included. Amyloid status was defined dichotomously using an a priori mean cortical cut-off. PIB converters (n=20) at baseline exhibited significantly lower CSF Aβ42 compared to those who remained PIB- (n=123), but higher compared to PIB+ group (n=21). A robust negative correlation (r=-0.879, p=0.0001) between CSF Aβ42 and absolute (but sub-threshold) PIB binding was observed during this early preclinical stage. The negative correlation was not as strong once individuals were PIB+ (r=-0.456, p=0.038), and there was no correlation in the stable PIB- group (p=0.905) or in the group (n=10) with early symptomatic AD (p=0.537). CSF Ab42 levels are tightly coupled with cortical amyloid load in the earliest stages of preclinical AD, and began to decrease dramatically prior to the point when an abnormal threshold of cortical accumulation is detected with amyloid imaging. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 29 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Psychology 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,784,103
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#1,363
of 5,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,941
of 365,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.