↓ Skip to main content

Validity and Reliability of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire to Assess Cognitive Symptoms in People With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and Reliability of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire to Assess Cognitive Symptoms in People With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Takasaki, Chi-Wen Chien, Venerina Johnston, Julia Treleaven, Gwendolen Jull

Abstract

To investigate the validity and reliability of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire (PDQ) for use in people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 25 32%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 31%
Psychology 13 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Unspecified 5 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#5,396
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,073
of 177,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#78
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.