| Title |
Impacts of invasive Asian (Amynthas hilgendorfi) and European (Lumbricus rubellus) earthworms in a North American temperate deciduous forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-012-0208-y |
| Authors |
Holly G. Greiner, Donna R. Kashian, Scott D. Tiegs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,266,555
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#342
of 2,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,241
of 160,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.