| Title |
Community ecological modelling as an alternative to physiographic classifications for marine conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1167-x |
| Authors |
Emily M Rubidge, Katie S. P. Gale, Janelle M. R. Curtis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 31% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2,090
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,080
of 377,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#43
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.