| Title |
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-016-4892-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuan Zhang, ZhengQiang Wei, MengJun Bie, XuDong Peng, Cheng Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Turkey | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Egypt | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,753,921
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#295
of 6,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,946
of 371,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#6
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.