You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of postfire climate and seed availability on postfire conifer regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/eap.2280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph A. E. Stewart, Phillip J. van Mantgem, Derek J. N. Young, Kristen L. Shive, Haiganoush K. Preisler, Adrian J. Das, Nathan L. Stephenson, Jon E. Keeley, Hugh D. Safford, Micah C. Wright, Kevin R. Welch, James H. Thorne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Luxembourg | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#238,585
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#50
of 3,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,656
of 421,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.