| Title |
Treatments and Services for Neurodevelopmental Disorders on Advocacy Websites: Information or Evaluation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-011-9102-z |
| Authors |
Nina C. Di Pietro, Louise Whiteley, Judy Illes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 27% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 29% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,901,219
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#191
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,947
of 106,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.