↓ Skip to main content

Spittlebugs as vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in olive orchards in Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pest Science, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 650)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Spittlebugs as vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in olive orchards in Italy
Published in
Journal of Pest Science, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10340-016-0793-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Cornara, Maria Saponari, Adam R. Zeilinger, Angelo de Stradis, Donato Boscia, Giuliana Loconsole, Domenico Bosco, Giovanni P. Martelli, Rodrigo P. P. Almeida, Francesco Porcelli

Abstract

The recent introduction of Xylella fastidiosa in Europe and its involvement in the Olive Quick Decline Syndrome (OQDS) in Apulia (Salento, Lecce district, South Italy) led us to investigate the biology and transmission ability of the meadow spittlebug, Philaenus spumarius, which was recently demonstrated to transmit X. fastidiosa to periwinkle plants. Four xylem-sap-feeding insect species were found within and bordering olive orchards across Salento during a survey carried out from October 2013 to December 2014: P. spumarius was the most abundant species on non-olive vegetation in olive orchards as well as on olive foliage and was the only species that consistently tested positive for the presence of X. fastidiosa using real-time PCR. P. spumarius, whose nymphs develop within spittle on weeds during the spring, are likely to move from weeds beneath olive trees to olive canopy during the dry period (May to October 2014). The first X. fastidiosa-infective P. spumarius were collected in May from olive canopy: all the individuals previously collected on weeds tested negative for the bacterium. Experiments demonstrated that P. spumarius transmitted X. fastidiosa from infected to uninfected olive plants. Moreover, P. spumarius acquired X. fastidiosa from several host plant species in the field, with the highest acquisition rate from olive, polygala and acacia. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed bacterial cells resembling X. fastidiosa in the foreguts of adult P. spumarius. The data presented here are essential to plan an effective IPM strategy and limit further spread of the fastidious bacterium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Chemistry 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 43 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,562,388
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#29
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,432
of 376,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them