↓ Skip to main content

Hormones as doping in sports

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Hormones as doping in sports
Published in
Endocrine, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12020-012-9794-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonidas H. Duntas, Vera Popovic

Abstract

Though we may still sing today, as did Pindar in his eighth Olympian Victory Ode, "… of no contest greater than Olympia, Mother of Games, gold-wreathed Olympia…", we must sadly admit that today, besides blatant over-commercialization, there is no more ominous threat to the Olympic games than doping. Drug-use methods are steadily becoming more sophisticated and ever harder to detect, increasingly demanding the use of complex analytical procedures of biotechnology and molecular medicine. Special emphasis is thus given to anabolic androgenic steroids, recombinant growth hormone and erythropoietin as well as to gene doping, the newly developed mode of hormones abuse which, for its detection, necessitates high-tech methodology but also multidisciplinary individual measures incorporating educational and psychological methods. In this Olympic year, the present review offers an update on the current technologically advanced endocrine methods of doping while outlining the latest procedures applied-including both the successes and pitfalls of proteomics and metabolomics-to detect doping while contributing to combating this scourge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Sports and Recreations 13 14%
Chemistry 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,365,858
of 24,362,308 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine
#934
of 1,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,278
of 173,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,362,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.