↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative Judgement of Research Impact: Domain Taxonomy as a Fundamental Framework for Judgement of the Quality of Research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Classification, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Qualitative Judgement of Research Impact: Domain Taxonomy as a Fundamental Framework for Judgement of the Quality of Research
Published in
Journal of Classification, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00357-018-9247-0
Authors

Fionn Murtagh, Michael Orlov, Boris Mirkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 22%
Engineering 3 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Classification
#80
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,429
of 347,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Classification
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them