↓ Skip to main content

Galilean electromagnetism

Overview of attention for article published in Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Galilean electromagnetism
Published in
Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/bf02895715
Authors

M. Le Bellac, J. M. Lévy-Leblond

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,994,598
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B
#13
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,974
of 93,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.