You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Home-based narrowband UVB, topical corticosteroid or combination for children and adults with vitiligo: HI-Light Vitiligo three-arm RCT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3310/hta24640 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan M Batchelor, Adam Millington, Kim S Thomas, Perways Akram, Jaskiran Azad, Anthony Bewley, Joanne R Chalmers, Seau Tak Cheung, Lelia Duley, Viktoria Eleftheriadou, Robert Ellis, Adam Ferguson, Jonathan MR Goulding, Rachel H Haines, Hamdi Hamad, John R Ingram, Bisola Laguda, Paul Leighton, Nick Levell, Areti Makrygeorgou, Garry D Meakin, Malobi Ogboli, Amirtha Rajasekaran, Jane C Ravenscroft, Andrew Rogers, Tracey H Sach, Miriam Santer, Julia Stainforth, Wei Tan, Shyamal Wahie, Jennifer White, Maxine E Whitton, Hywel C Williams, Andrew Wright, Alan A Montgomery |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 60 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#16,279,421
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#1,124
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,003
of 442,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#24
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.