| Title |
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: reproducibility and biological validation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-012-2654-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Heijmen, Edwin E. G. W. ter Voert, Iris D. Nagtegaal, Paul Span, Johan Bussink, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Fred C. G. J. Sweep, Arend Heerschap, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven |
| Abstract |
Before diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can be implemented in standard clinical practice for response monitoring, data on reproducibility are needed to assess which differences outside the range of normal variation can be detected in an individual patient. In this study we assessed the reproducibility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in colorectal liver metastases. To provide a biological basis for these values, their relation with histopathology was assessed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 65% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,167,959
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,285
of 4,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,367
of 171,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#29
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.