| Title |
Social Interaction Style of Children and Adolescents with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-012-1451-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anke M. Scheeren, Hans M. Koot, Sander Begeer |
| Abstract |
Qualitative differences in social interaction style exist within the autism spectrum. In this study we examined whether these differences are associated with (1) the severity of autistic symptoms and comorbid disruptive behavior problems, (2) the child's psycho-social health, and (3) executive functioning and perspective taking skills. The social interaction style of 156 children and adolescents (6-19 years) with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder (HFASD) was determined with the Wing Subgroups Questionnaire. An active-but-odd social interaction style was positively associated with symptoms of autism, attention deficit and hyperactivity. Furthermore, an active-but-odd social interaction style was negatively associated with children's psycho-social health and positively with executive functioning problems. Social interaction style explains part of the heterogeneity among children with HFASD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 92 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,452,294
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,332
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,406
of 254,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#28
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.