| Title |
DNA Polymerase and Mismatch Repair Exert Distinct Microsatellite Instability Signatures in Normal and Malignant Human Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiil Chung, Yosef E. Maruvka, Sumedha Sudhaman, Jacalyn Kelly, Nicholas J. Haradhvala, Vanessa Bianchi, Melissa Edwards, Victoria J. Forster, Nuno M. Nunes, Melissa A. Galati, Martin Komosa, Shriya Deshmukh, Vanja Cabric, Scott Davidson, Matthew Zatzman, Nicholas Light, Reid Hayes, Ledia Brunga, Nathaniel D. Anderson, Ben Ho, Karl P. Hodel, Robert Siddaway, A. Sorana Morrissy, Daniel C. Bowers, Valérie Larouche, Annika Bronsema, Michael Osborn, Kristina A. Cole, Enrico Opocher, Gary Mason, Gregory A. Thomas, Ben George, David S. Ziegler, Scott Lindhorst, Magimairajan Vanan, Michal Yalon-Oren, Alyssa T. Reddy, Maura Massimino, Patrick Tomboc, An Van Damme, Alexander Lossos, Carol Durno, Melyssa Aronson, Daniel A. Morgenstern, Eric Bouffet, Annie Huang, Michael D. Taylor, Anita Villani, David Malkin, Cynthia E. Hawkins, Zachary F. Pursell, Adam Shlien, Thomas A. Kunkel, Gad Getz, Uri Tabori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 32% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Italy | 4 | 7% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 47% |
| Scientists | 27 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,126,472
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#574
of 4,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,474
of 518,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#16
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.