↓ Skip to main content

Influence of anharmonic convex interparticle potential and Shapiro steps in the opposite direction of driving force

Overview of attention for article published in Physica Scripta, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of anharmonic convex interparticle potential and Shapiro steps in the opposite direction of driving force
Published in
Physica Scripta, January 2021
DOI 10.1088/1402-4896/abd5ec
Authors

Sonja Gombar, Petar Mali, Slobodan Radoevi, Jasmina Teki, Milan Panti, Milica Pavkov-Hrvojevi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,778,496
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Physica Scripta
#1,274
of 3,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,977
of 503,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physica Scripta
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.