↓ Skip to main content

Simulating recurrent event data with hazard functions defined on a total time scale

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Simulating recurrent event data with hazard functions defined on a total time scale
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0005-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antje Jahn-Eimermacher, Katharina Ingel, Ann-Kathrin Ozga, Stella Preussler, Harald Binder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 12 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,360,755
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#535
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,957
of 259,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.