↓ Skip to main content

Arginine and Caries Prevention: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Caries Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arginine and Caries Prevention: A Systematic Review
Published in
Caries Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1159/000446249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Álfheiður Ástvaldsdóttir, Aron Naimi-Akbar, Thomas Davidson, Agneta Brolund, Laura Lintamo, Anna Attergren Granath, Sofia Tranæus, Pernilla Östlund

Abstract

To evaluate the available evidence that the use of arginine-containing dental care products prevents the development of new caries lesions and the progression of existing lesions. We performed a systematic literature search of databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE. We selected randomized controlled trials of treatment with arginine in fluoride-containing dental products measuring dental caries incidence or progression in children, adults and elderly subjects. Two review authors independently assessed trials for risk of bias and evaluated overall study quality using the GRADE classification. Due to conflicts of interest and weak transferability to Swedish conditions, no conclusions can be drawn from studies on the effects of arginine-fluoride toothpaste in children. Arginine-containing toothpaste costs about 40% more than basic fluoride toothpaste; to determine whether it is more cost-effective, the higher cost must be considered in relation to any additional caries-preventive effect. The literature review also disclosed some questionable research ethics: in several of the studies, the children in the control group used non-fluoride toothpaste. Toothpaste without fluoride is not as effective against dental caries as the standard treatment - fluoride toothpaste - which has a well-documented effect. This contravenes the fundamental principles of research ethics. At present there is insufficient evidence in support of a caries-preventive effect for the inclusion of arginine in toothpastes. More rigorous studies, and studies which are less dependent on commercial interests, are required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 49 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 48 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#12,767,578
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Caries Research
#805
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,098
of 354,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Caries Research
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.