| Title |
Medical Scribes: Salvation for Primary Care or Workaround for Poor EMR Usability?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-016-3788-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon D. Schiff, Laura Zucker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 18% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#590,906
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#465
of 8,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,702
of 370,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.