| Title |
Efficacy of early hydroxychloroquine treatment in preventing COVID-19 pneumonia aggravation, the experience from Shanghai, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience Trends, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5582/bst.2020.03340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi Su, Yun Ling, Yuyan Ma, Lili Tao, Qing Miao, Qingfeng Shi, Jue Pan, Hongzhou Lu, Bijie Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 206 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 34 | 17% |
| Brazil | 7 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Bahamas | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 145 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 197 | 96% |
| Scientists | 5 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#251,770
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BioScience Trends
#2
of 338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,191
of 526,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience Trends
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them