| Title |
Genome-wide expressions in autologous eutopic and ectopic endometrium of fertile women with endometriosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7827-10-84 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meraj A Khan, Jayasree Sengupta, Suneeta Mittal, Debabrata Ghosh |
| Abstract |
In order to obtain a lead of the pathophysiology of endometriosis, genome-wide expressional analyses of eutopic and ectopic endometrium have earlier been reported, however, the effects of stages of severity and phases of menstrual cycle on expressional profiles have not been examined. The effect of genetic heterogeneity and fertility history on transcriptional activity was also not considered. In the present study, a genome-wide expression analysis of autologous, paired eutopic and ectopic endometrial samples obtained from fertile women (n=18) suffering from moderate (stage 3; n=8) or severe (stage 4; n=10) ovarian endometriosis during proliferative (n=13) and secretory (n=5) phases of menstrual cycle was performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,607,238
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#485
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,802
of 171,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.