↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of improved glycaemic control after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mechanisms of improved glycaemic control after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Published in
Diabetologia, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00125-012-2556-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Dirksen, N. B. Jørgensen, K. N. Bojsen-Møller, S. H. Jacobsen, D. L. Hansen, D. Worm, J. J. Holst, S. Madsbad

Abstract

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) greatly improves glycaemic control in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes, in many even before significant weight loss. Understanding the responsible mechanisms may contribute to our knowledge of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and help identify new drug targets or improve surgical techniques. This review summarises the present knowledge based on pathophysiological studies published during the last decade. Taken together, two main mechanisms seem to be responsible for the early improvement in glycaemic control after RYGB: (1) an increase in hepatic insulin sensitivity induced, at least in part, by energy restriction and (2) improved beta cell function associated with an exaggerated postprandial glucagon-like peptide 1 secretion owing to the altered transit of nutrients. Later a weight loss induced improvement in peripheral insulin sensitivity follows.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 181 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 21 11%
Professor 10 5%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,416,987
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,821
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,955
of 163,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#20
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.