↓ Skip to main content

Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards
Published in
Quality of Life Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0252-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Brundage, Jane Blazeby, Dennis Revicki, Brenda Bass, Henrica de Vet, Helen Duffy, Fabio Efficace, Madeleine King, Cindy L. K. Lam, David Moher, Jane Scott, Jeff Sloan, Claire Snyder, Susan Yount, Melanie Calvert

Abstract

To develop expert consensus on a suite of reporting standards for HRQL outcomes of RCTs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Researcher 36 20%
Other 15 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 9%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 43 24%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 40%
Psychology 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Unspecified 7 4%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 30 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,825,100
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#688
of 2,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,543
of 170,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.