↓ Skip to main content

How psychedelic researchers’ self-admitted substance use and their association with psychedelic culture affect people’s perceptions of their scientific integrity and the quality of their research

Overview of attention for article published in Public Understanding of Science, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
45 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How psychedelic researchers’ self-admitted substance use and their association with psychedelic culture affect people’s perceptions of their scientific integrity and the quality of their research
Published in
Public Understanding of Science, December 2020
DOI 10.1177/0963662520981728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Forstmann, Christina Sagioglou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 16 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#747,748
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#80
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,657
of 529,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.