| Title |
Measuring the complexity of general practice consultations: development and validation of a complexity measure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0486 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Salisbury, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Clare R Bankhead, Alice Fuller, Mairead Murphy, Barbara Caddick, José M Ordóñez-Mena, Tim Holt, Brian D Nicholson, Rafael Perera, FD Richard Hobbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 61 | 62% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 57% |
| Scientists | 19 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#589,478
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#247
of 4,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,208
of 520,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.