| Title |
Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison: dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-012-2558-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. C. Dumville, M. O. Soares, S. O’Meara, N. Cullum |
| Abstract |
Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a common and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment. Existing systematic reviews are limited by the lack of head-to-head comparisons of alternative dressings in a field where there are several different dressing options. We aimed to determine the relative effects of alternative wound dressings on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 48 | 28% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,316,001
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,666
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,096
of 163,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#35
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.