↓ Skip to main content

The 11 April 2012 east Indian Ocean earthquake triggered large aftershocks worldwide

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 11 April 2012 east Indian Ocean earthquake triggered large aftershocks worldwide
Published in
Nature, September 2012
DOI 10.1038/nature11504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fred F. Pollitz, Ross S. Stein, Volkan Sevilgen, Roland Bürgmann

Abstract

Large earthquakes trigger very small earthquakes globally during passage of the seismic waves and during the following several hours to days, but so far remote aftershocks of moment magnitude M ≥ 5.5 have not been identified, with the lone exception of an M = 6.9 quake remotely triggered by the surface waves from an M = 6.6 quake 4,800 kilometres away. The 2012 east Indian Ocean earthquake that had a moment magnitude of 8.6 is the largest strike-slip event ever recorded. Here we show that the rate of occurrence of remote M ≥ 5.5 earthquakes (>1,500 kilometres from the epicentre) increased nearly fivefold for six days after the 2012 event, and extended in magnitude to M ≤ 7. These global aftershocks were located along the four lobes of Love-wave radiation; all struck where the dynamic shear strain is calculated to exceed 10(-7) for at least 100 seconds during dynamic-wave passage. The other M ≥ 8.5 mainshocks during the past decade are thrusts; after these events, the global rate of occurrence of remote M ≥ 5.5 events increased by about one-third the rate following the 2012 shock and lasted for only two days, a weaker but possibly real increase. We suggest that the unprecedented delayed triggering power of the 2012 earthquake may have arisen because of its strike-slip source geometry or because the event struck at a time of an unusually low global earthquake rate, perhaps increasing the number of nucleation sites that were very close to failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Italy 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 173 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 26%
Professor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Student > Master 12 6%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 135 72%
Engineering 7 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#221,350
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#12,909
of 98,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,061
of 191,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#131
of 1,059 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,059 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.