| Title |
A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature11450 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junjie Qin, Yingrui Li, Zhiming Cai, Shenghui Li, Jianfeng Zhu, Fan Zhang, Suisha Liang, Wenwei Zhang, Yuanlin Guan, Dongqian Shen, Yangqing Peng, Dongya Zhang, Zhuye Jie, Wenxian Wu, Youwen Qin, Wenbin Xue, Junhua Li, Lingchuan Han, Donghui Lu, Peixian Wu, Yali Dai, Xiaojuan Sun, Zesong Li, Aifa Tang, Shilong Zhong, Xiaoping Li, Weineng Chen, Ran Xu, Mingbang Wang, Qiang Feng, Meihua Gong, Jing Yu, Yanyan Zhang, Ming Zhang, Torben Hansen, Gaston Sanchez, Jeroen Raes, Gwen Falony, Shujiro Okuda, Mathieu Almeida, Emmanuelle LeChatelier, Pierre Renault, Nicolas Pons, Jean-Michel Batto, Zhaoxi Zhang, Hua Chen, Ruifu Yang, Weimou Zheng, Songgang Li, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, S. Dusko Ehrlich, Rasmus Nielsen, Oluf Pedersen, Karsten Kristiansen, Jun Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 12% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Egypt | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 63% |
| Scientists | 23 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | <1% |
| Denmark | 7 | <1% |
| Russia | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| India | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 56 | 1% |
| Unknown | 4300 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 850 | 19% |
| Researcher | 719 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 623 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 482 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 224 | 5% |
| Other | 651 | 15% |
| Unknown | 898 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1174 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 760 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 535 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 264 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 102 | 2% |
| Other | 549 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1063 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#61,454
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,820
of 99,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241
of 191,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#37
of 1,059 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,059 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.