↓ Skip to main content

On the presumed superiority of analytical solutions over numerical methods

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal for Philosophy of Science, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
On the presumed superiority of analytical solutions over numerical methods
Published in
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13194-016-0152-2
Authors

Vincent Ardourel, Julie Jebeile

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#316
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,588
of 370,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.