↓ Skip to main content

Excellent Clinical Outcomes From a National Donation-After-Determination-of-Cardiac-Death Lung Transplant Collaborative

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Transplantation, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Excellent Clinical Outcomes From a National Donation-After-Determination-of-Cardiac-Death Lung Transplant Collaborative
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, July 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04193.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

B.J. Levvey, M. Harkess, P. Hopkins, D. Chambers, C. Merry, A.R. Glanville, G.I. Snell

Abstract

Donation-after-Determination-of-Cardiac-Death (DDCD) donor lungs can potentially increase the pool of lungs available for Lung Transplantation (LTx). This paper presents the 5-year results for Maastricht category III DDCD LTx undertaken by the multicenter Australian National DDCD LTx Collaborative. The Collaborative was developed to facilitate interaction with the Australian Organ Donation Authority, standardization of definitions, guidelines, education and audit processes. Between 2006 and 2011 there were 174 actual DDCD category III donors (with an additional 37 potentially suitable donors who did not arrest in the mandated 90 min postwithdrawal window), of whom 71 donated lungs for 70 bilateral LTx and two single LTx. In 2010 this equated to an "extra" 28% of donors utilized for LTx. Withdrawal to pulmonary arterial flush was a mean of 35.2 ± 4.0 min (range 18-89). At 24 h, the incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was 8.5%[median PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio 315 (range 50-507)]. Overall the incidence of grade 3 chronic rejections was 5%. One- and 5-year actuarial survival was 97% and 90%, versus 90% and 61%, respectively, for 503 contemporaneous brain-dead donor lung transplants. Category III DDCD LTx therefore provides a significant, practical, additional quality source of transplantable lungs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Other 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#4,368
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,593
of 178,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#41
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.