↓ Skip to main content

3‐Methyladipate excretion in animals fed a phytol supplement with reference to Refsum's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, June 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
Title
3‐Methyladipate excretion in animals fed a phytol supplement with reference to Refsum's disease
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, June 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf01811502
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Krywawych, D. P. Brenton, M. J. Jackson, C. Forte, D. K. Walker, A. M. Lawson

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,719,239
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#296
of 1,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,122
of 9,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them