You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deciduous trees are a large and overlooked sink for snowmelt water in the boreal forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep29504 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica M. Young-Robertson, W. Robert Bolton, Uma S. Bhatt, Jordi Cristóbal, Richard Thoman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 24% |
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 7 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,191,796
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#11,957
of 142,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,243
of 376,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#320
of 3,711 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,711 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.