↓ Skip to main content

Folate Augmentation of Treatment – Evaluation for Depression (FolATED): protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Folate Augmentation of Treatment – Evaluation for Depression (FolATED): protocol of a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-7-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seren Haf Roberts, Emma Bedson, Dyfrig Hughes, Keith Lloyd, Stuart Moat, Munir Pirmohamed, Gary Slegg, Richard Tranter, Rhiannon Whitaker, Clare Wilkinson, Ian Russell

Abstract

Clinical depression is common, debilitating and treatable; one in four people experience it during their lives. The majority of sufferers are treated in primary care and only half respond well to active treatment. Evidence suggests that folate may be a useful adjunct to antidepressant treatment: 1) patients with depression often have a functional folate deficiency; 2) the severity of such deficiency, indicated by elevated homocysteine, correlates with depression severity, 3) low folate is associated with poor antidepressant response, and 4) folate is required for the synthesis of neurotransmitters implicated in the pathogenesis and treatment of depression. The primary objective of this trial is to estimate the effect of folate augmentation in new or continuing treatment of depressive disorder in primary and secondary care. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of folate augmentation of antidepressant treatment, investigate how the response to antidepressant treatment depends on genetic polymorphisms relevant to folate metabolism and antidepressant response, and explore whether baseline folate status can predict response to antidepressant treatment. Seven hundred and thirty patients will be recruited from North East Wales, North West Wales and Swansea. Patients with moderate to severe depression will be referred to the trial by their GP or Psychiatrist. If patients consent they will be assessed for eligibility and baseline measures will be undertaken. Blood samples will be taken to exclude patients with folate and B12 deficiency. Some of the blood taken will be used to measure homocysteine levels and for genetic analysis (with additional consent). Eligible participants will be randomised to receive 5 mg of folic acid or placebo. Patients with B12 deficiency or folate deficiency will be given appropriate treatment and will be monitored in the 'comprehensive cohort study'. Assessments will be at screening, randomisation and 3 subsequent follow-ups. If folic acid is shown to improve the efficacy of antidepressants, then it will provide a safe, simple and cheap way of improving the treatment of depression in primary and secondary care. Current controlled trials ISRCTN37558856.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Psychology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,719,239
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,757
of 4,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,937
of 76,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.