| Title |
QCAL—a novel standard for assessing instrument conditions for proteome analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.05.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire E. Eyers, Deborah M. Simpson, Stephen C. C. Wong, Robert J. Beynon, Simon J. Gaskell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1,226
of 3,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,829
of 245,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#65
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.