You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-33386-6 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-64-233385-9, 978-3-64-233386-6
|
| Authors |
Supratik Chakraborty, Madhavan Mukund |
| Editors |
Supratik Chakraborty, Madhavan Mukund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,169,194
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,020
of 8,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,199
of 244,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#117
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.