| Title |
Factors affecting the foraging behaviour of the European shag: implications for seabird tracking studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-014-2422-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. M. Soanes, J. P. Y. Arnould, S. G. Dodd, G. Milligan, J. A. Green |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,418
of 3,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,397
of 242,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#16
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.