↓ Skip to main content

Meta-analyses of genome-wide linkage scans of anxiety-related phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-analyses of genome-wide linkage scans of anxiety-related phenotypes
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, April 2012
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2012.47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley T Webb, An-Yuan Guo, Brion S Maher, Zhongming Zhao, Edwin J van den Oord, Kenneth S Kendler, Brien P Riley, Nathan A Gillespie, Carol A Prescott, Christel M Middeldorp, Gonneke Willemsen, Eco JC de Geus, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Dorret I Boomsma, Eline P Slagboom, Naomi R Wray, Grant W Montgomery, Nicholas G Martin, Margie J Wright, Andrew C Heath, Pamela A Madden, Joel Gelernter, James A Knowles, Steven P Hamilton, Myrna M Weissman, Abby J Fyer, Patricia Huezo-Diaz, Peter McGuffin, Anne Farmer, Ian W Craig, Cathryn Lewis, Pak Sham, Raymond R Crowe, Jonathan Flint, John M Hettema

Abstract

Genetic factors underlying trait neuroticism, reflecting a tendency towards negative affective states, may overlap genetic susceptibility for anxiety disorders and help explain the extensive comorbidity amongst internalizing disorders. Genome-wide linkage (GWL) data from several studies of neuroticism and anxiety disorders have been published, providing an opportunity to test such hypotheses and identify genomic regions that harbor genes common to these phenotypes. In all, 11 independent GWL studies of either neuroticism (n=8) or anxiety disorders (n=3) were collected, which comprised of 5341 families with 15 529 individuals. The rank-based genome scan meta-analysis (GSMA) approach was used to analyze each trait separately and combined, and global correlations between results were examined. False discovery rate (FDR) analysis was performed to test for enrichment of significant effects. Using 10 cM intervals, bins nominally significant for both GSMA statistics, P(SR) and P(OR), were found on chromosomes 9, 11, 12, and 14 for neuroticism and on chromosomes 1, 5, 15, and 16 for anxiety disorders. Genome-wide, the results for the two phenotypes were significantly correlated, and a combined analysis identified additional nominally significant bins. Although none reached genome-wide significance, an excess of significant P(SR)P-values were observed, with 12 bins falling under a FDR threshold of 0.50. As demonstrated by our identification of multiple, consistent signals across the genome, meta-analytically combining existing GWL data is a valuable approach to narrowing down regions relevant for anxiety-related phenotypes. This may prove useful for prioritizing emerging genome-wide association data for anxiety disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,316,001
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#3,082
of 3,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,287
of 161,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#30
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.