↓ Skip to main content

The 2012 Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Intraarticular Analgesia After TKA Reduces Pain: A Randomized, Double‐blinded, Placebo‐controlled, Prospective Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
The 2012 Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Intraarticular Analgesia After TKA Reduces Pain: A Randomized, Double‐blinded, Placebo‐controlled, Prospective Study
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2596-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nitin Goyal, James McKenzie, Peter F. Sharkey, Javad Parvizi, William J. Hozack, Matthew S. Austin

Abstract

Postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty remains one of the most important challenges facing patients undergoing this surgery. Providing a balance of adequate analgesia while limiting the functional impact of regional anesthesia and minimizing opioid side effects is critical to minimize adverse events and improve patient satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 39 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 47 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,218,934
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,637
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,358
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#20
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.