↓ Skip to main content

Effects of kinesiotherapy, ultrasound and electrotherapy in management of bilateral knee osteoarthritis: prospective clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
Title
Effects of kinesiotherapy, ultrasound and electrotherapy in management of bilateral knee osteoarthritis: prospective clinical trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naryana Cristina Mascarin, Rodrigo Luiz Vancini, Marília dos Santos Andrade, Eduardo de Paiva Magalhães, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, Ibsen Bellini Coimbra

Abstract

Although recent advances in knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment and evaluation were achieved, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have evaluated the longitudinal effect of therapeutic modalities on the functional exercise capacity of patients with knee OA. The purpose was to investigate the effects of kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy on functional exercise capacity, evaluated using the six-minute walk test (6-MWT) in patients with bilateral knee OA. Secondary measurements included range of motion (ROM), severity of knee pain (VAS), and a measure of perceived health and physical function, evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index. A total of 40 women with bilateral knee OA were assigned to three groups: kinesiotherapy (KIN, n = 16), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS, n = 12), or ultrasound (US, n = 10). The groups underwent 12 weeks of intervention twice per week. The participants were subjected to the 6-MWT, ROM, VAS and WOMAC index. These tests were performed before and after the intervention. The study was focused on outpatients and was carried out at Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil. At follow-up, the KIN and US groups had significantly higher 6-MWT distances (19.8 ± 21.7 and 14.1 ± 22.5%, respectively) compared with their respective pre-intervention values. All treatments were effective for reducing pain and improving the WOMAC index. We demonstrated that the 6-MWT is a tool that can be used to evaluate improvements in the functional exercise capacity of patients submitted to a clinical intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 298 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 17%
Student > Master 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 5%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 112 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Sports and Recreations 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 120 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,136,425
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,815
of 4,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,169
of 170,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#39
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.