↓ Skip to main content

Mad, bad and dangerous to know

Overview of attention for article published in Analysis, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mad, bad and dangerous to know
Published in
Analysis, February 2012
DOI 10.1093/analys/ans049
Authors

Rachael Briggs, Daniel Nolan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Israel 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Professor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 17 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,316,001
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Analysis
#475
of 598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,656
of 155,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analysis
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.