You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
水の硬度が牛肉,鶏肉およびじゃがいもの水煮に及ぼす影響
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cookery Science of Japan, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.11402/cookeryscience.46.161 |
| Authors |
鈴野 弘子, 石田 裕 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19,163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3711 | 19% |
| China | 78 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 47 | <1% |
| United States | 43 | <1% |
| Austria | 42 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 36 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 22 | <1% |
| North Macedonia | 18 | <1% |
| France | 18 | <1% |
| Other | 246 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14902 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19122 | 100% |
| Scientists | 22 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1569. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,327
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cookery Science of Japan
#1
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23
of 210,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cookery Science of Japan
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them