↓ Skip to main content

Immunosuppressive effects of Ixodes ricinus tick saliva or salivary gland extracts on innate and acquired immune response of BALB/c mice

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Immunosuppressive effects of Ixodes ricinus tick saliva or salivary gland extracts on innate and acquired immune response of BALB/c mice
Published in
Parasitology Research, March 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00436-001-0515-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naceur Mejri, Bernard Rutti, Michel Brossard

Abstract

Saliva and salivary gland extract (SGE) of Ixodes ricinus ticks have suppressive effects on the innate immune response of BALB/c mice. Tick saliva prevents hemolysis of sheep red blood cells (SRBC) by the human alternative pathway of complement. The adaptive immune response is also modulated by tick antigens (saliva or SGE). When stimulated in vitro with increasing doses of tick antigens, the proliferation and IL-4 production of draining lymph node T cells of mice infested with nymphal ticks increase, peak and then decrease. These results indicate that immunostimulative and immunosuppressive molecules have competing effects in tick saliva or in SGE. I. ricinus saliva inhibits, in a dose-dependent manner, splenic T cell proliferation in response to concanavalin A (ConA). Tick SGE or saliva injected intraperitoneally to BALB/c mice simultaneously with SRBC systemically immunosuppress the anti-SRBC response as shown in vitro by the reduced responsiveness of sensitized splenic T cells to restimulation with SRBC. In brief some components of SGE or tick saliva reduce the responsiveness of draining lymph node T cells and of sensitized splenic T cells in vitro. The responsiveness of naive splenic T cells to ConA stimulation in vitro is also decreased by tick saliva. Modulation of host responses by tick antigens may facilitate tick feeding, transmission and the propagation of pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,683,322
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#582
of 3,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,712
of 47,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,956 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.