You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Community Occupational Therapy for people with dementia and family carers (COTiD-UK) versus treatment as usual (Valuing Active Life in Dementia [VALID]) study: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003433 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Wenborn, Aidan G. O’Keeffe, Gail Mountain, Esme Moniz-Cook, Michael King, Rumana Z. Omar, Jacqueline Mundy, Jane Burgess, Fiona Poland, Stephen Morris, Elena Pizzo, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, David Challis, Susan Michie, Ian Russell, Catherine Sackley, Maud Graff, Tom Swinson, Nadia Crellin, Sinéad Hynes, Jacki Stansfeld, Martin Orrell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 32% |
| Japan | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 104 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 12% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 107 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,459,915
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,998
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,739
of 520,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#31
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.